Comparing Emotions Are Contagious, By Marko Ahtisaari And...

â€Å"Mirroring: Emotions are Contagious† When two people interact, numerous mechanisms are at play that create a connection between the individuals. For instance, without knowing it, people often tend to mimic each other’s postures and speech styles during discussion. Also emotions are contagious: according to a study, exposure to pictures of facial expressions of emotions activated the same facial muscles needed to produce a similar expression and led to reports of experiencing similar feelings in the observers. Astonishingly, this happened even if the pictures were shown so quickly that the observers didn’t experience a conscious perception of the photo. The Sync Project By Marko Ahtisaari and Ketki Karanam â€Å"Movement: Music Moves You, Even If You Refuse to Dance† Humans are one of the extremely few species that can synchronize their body movement to music. Brain imaging studies have shown that the motor areas of the brain are active even during passive listening to musical rhythms without any movement. It has been said that music prepares people for movement. But how is this special property of music connected to the experience of emotions? It has been proposed that the aforementioned â€Å"human mirror† neuron system could in fact also encode the movements conveyed by melodies. This would mean that the system might process movement in music like physical movement. In other words, an upward going melody would be processed in the brain as upward movement. And as

Ideological Conflict And Political Polarization - 2143 Words

Ralph Mehitang Political Science 102 Professor Robinson November 28, 2016 Polarization In America Ideological Conflict is defined as the mental, verbal, or physical manifestation of rivalry between people that share opposing world views. Political polarization relates to when a person’s view and stance on a topic, law, issue or particular group of people is stringently defined by their identification with a particular political party or ideology. Ever since the 1960s ideological conflict and political polarization have evolved as more factors have come into play. Examples of important factors that have fueled the evolution of these two topics are abortion, the death penalty, gay marriage, gun control, illegal immigration, Euthanasia, drug, war, and religion. These factors are important topics that over the years have caused the evolution of ideological conflict and political polarization and have caused such divide amongst the people of America when it comes to their views and stance on specific things. In my opinion I believe to the utmost degree that ideological conflict and political polarization poses a major threat to the effective functioning of the democracy in America today. Political polarization today is on a completely different level than what it was 30-50 years. It’s safe to say that the 1960s were bad, other than during the the civil war the country had never been so divided ideologically. The government was facing debates over civil rightsShow MoreRelatedThe Growing Ideological Gap Between The United States’1592 Words   |  7 PagesThe growing ideological gap between the United States’ two major political parties, in other words, rising levels of political polarization, has had a negative impact on American politics as it results in Congressional inefficient, public apathy, and economic inequality. The United States has maintained its two party system for some time, but the major parties have not always been so clearly separated. In the early and mid-twentieth century, polarization was actually declining, as there was muchRead MoreAmerican Politics And The United States Congress Essay952 Words   |  4 Pagesto understand the causes of increasing partisanship and polarization in the United States Congress. Since the 1970s, the ideological positions of the two major U.S. parties, the Democratic and Republican parties, have widened (Abramowitz and Saunders, 2008; Levendusky; 2010). This ideological divide also promotes a perception among the American public that Congress has increasingly become ineffective and polarized to a point where political parties in government no longer compromise on policy forRead MoreTo persuade my audience that a parliamentary system is useful in the US. I. Introduction A.1200 Words   |  5 PagesMain Points: What problems revolve with Political Polarization and whom does it begin with? Who influences Political Polarization? Who does Political Polarization effect? What does Political Polarization affect? What possible solutions are there to resolve Political Polarization? II. In a multi-party system like the US, government officials in Congress are not reaching agreement on issues that matter to the public which has become known as political polarization, or partisanship. A. (Definition) defineRead MorePolarization in Congress: A Dichotomy of Unity and Division within the Legislative Branch991 Words   |  4 PagesPolarization in Congress: A Dichotomy of Unity and Division within the Legislative Branch POLARIZATION OVERVIEW: Polarization occurs when members of both political parties consistently vote along ideological lines. Ideological differences in Congress today are quite staggering. Congressmen have increasingly been moving away from moderate stances and adhering more to party ideologies. The issue with polarization arises when there are two incredibly differing ideologies where both sides feelRead MoreThe Spanish Civil War: A Microcosm of the Polarization of European Politics1566 Words   |  7 PagesTo what extent did the Spanish Civil War represent a microcosm of the polarization of European politics between the Right and the Left? The Spanish Civil War is the name given to the struggle between loyalist and nationalist Spain for dominance in which the nationalists won and suppressed the country for the following thirty nine years. However, because of the larger political climate that the Spanish Civil War occurred in, it is impossible to view the war as a phenomenon contained within oneRead MorePolarization in Us Politics1665 Words   |  7 Pagespolitics is becoming more polarized. If so, is this a reaction to the polarization of political elites? Approx 1500 words 13/12/10 The election of 2008... marked the end of an epoch. No longer could Republicans count on the basic conservatism of the American people, the reflexive hostility to candidates who favour big government (Darman, 2010, 34) In the 1970s and 1980s there was a consensus that the importance of political parties was in decline, that the shared conservative ideology ofRead MoreCulture War By Morris Fiorina2000 Words   |  8 Pagesbook, Culture War by Morris Fiorina, his political stance on Americans not being polarized has not been caused by a growing significance of the political parties today, rather a change in the government over the years. He believes that the two parties, Democrat, and Republican are the most polarized while the public is not. Abramowitz argues that there is no polarized relationship between the American people and the political parties. He believes the polarization is reflected through those who are politicallyRead MoreExamining Low Young Voter Turnout1193 Words   |  5 Pagesyoung voter turnout being disproportionately lower, the impact we have on our government policy’s also disproportionate, or as world renowned Political Scientist Dr. Arend Lijphart puts it â€Å"uneq ual participation means unequal influence.† (Lijphart). The Causes The three main factors effecting young voter turnout are: Civic Education, Political Polarization, and Voter Registration. Civic Education Civic Education’s important because it helps familiarize young people with our electoral and governmentRead MoreSpanish Civil War1918 Words   |  8 Pagescourtesy of the Great Depression, so naturally unemployment rates were high and wages were low. Ideological differences between various political groups were in existence due to the radicalized time, however not to the extent as in most other European nations at the time as Spain was not as heavily involved in or impacted by WWI. On top of this, Spain had been rife with regional, economic, and social conflict for decades. These factors, although minor in the context of the causes of the Spanish civilRead MoreCulture War By Morris Fiorina6419 Words   |  26 Pagescovers perspectives on abortion, homosexuality, and whether or not electoral cleavages have shifted. A large point of Fiorina’s is his take on the 2004 election. He ends the book with, how did our great nation get to this position of proclaimed polarization, and how do we improve from here? In chapter 1, Morris Fiorina begins the book by describing the fiery dispute between Pat Buchanan and George H. W. Bush. He segues these two politicians battling it out in strong disagreement into the cultural

Review for the World That Trade Created Free Essays

In trade routes and otherwise greed led to violence. This was demonstrated through slavery, piracy, and control of ivory and opium. African slavery began from greed; Europeans needed labor to fuel their large trading productions and manufacturing of the traded goods. We will write a custom essay sample on Review for the World That Trade Created or any similar topic only for you Order Now Mesoamerican slavery and destruction was caused by the Spanish conquistadors in their infamous quest for gold, god, and glory. Through greed the conquistadors decimated an entire civilization to obtain their gold. However the British and Dutch reaped many economic benefits of this perhaps even without knowledge of where their wealth had come from. Piracy, also fueled by greed, began as small bands, but eventually transformed into large companies of corporate raiders. The demanding trade of ivory and opium came from greed and addiction. They became key â€Å"luxury† items for wealthy Europeans, and it was the incentive for wars and violence. Pommeranz demonstrates throughout chapter five that greed led to violence. Gold, God, and Glory powered everything in the beginning. The Spanish enslaved the Aztecs when they conquered them to help them with sugar production rates, increasing their profit. The Spanish also attempted to convert the Aztecs to Catholisism, and if they rebelled, they were forced into slavery in the name of God. Lastly, they were immensley proud because they managed to conquer the Aztecs, claiming the land as their own while also beginning the use of slavery. Slavery was also pertinnent later in history when the Dutch, seeking revenge upon the Spanish while also being enticed by the wealth sugar trade brought, conquered a port in Brazil, controling the sugar trade. However, they did not have enough slaves to take advantage of the sugar, so although they opposed it at first, travelled to African ports and obtained slaves by exchanging luxury goods for human lives. Although the Portuguese regaiined control of the sugar production in Brazil, the Dutch still utilized the advantages of slavery in Africa and the exploitation of human lives that were not theirs to control. Lastly, Robinson Crusoe eventually learned to abandon his ideas of self sufficiency and rejection of luxury, and entered into the slave trade, enticed by the wealth it would bring him. Before corporations, there were family ties. Blood was the medium that bound together the many companies of the time. One example of such a family company was Samuel Rosenfelder’s fur trading house. As Rosenfelder added to his company, he also prepared his son Max to take over the company in the future. Eventually, Max would continue passing the company to his three sons. However, by the 1600s, there was an obvious advantage to using corporations to conduct business. Corporations were impersonal alliances that provided a logical and easy way to do business on a large—global—scale. The first corporations were anonymous with wide distributions of power and not really necessary until the railroad boom in the 1830s. However, these corporations gave birth to something useful at the time: corporate raiders. With the amount of sea trade that was happening, corporate raiders became the new pirates. Made of refugees, criminals, runaways, and mercenaries, corporate raiders are referred to as â€Å"multinational, multiethnic, democratic bands of sea rovers. † Although they had less dignity and were more violent than â€Å"traditional† pirates, corporate raiders were often favored in the eyes of the law, signifying government’s involvement in trade. After all, trade was a fruitful source of income. As the greed and available wealth grew, so did violence on the seas. The history of trade has taught us a lesson about greed, and the horrors it can lead to. Greed for products often leads towards violence. Two outstanding examples of this were the result of Great Britain’s greed for Chinese Tea, and King Leopold’s desire to begin an ivory market. Hooked on the imported Chinese Tea, British people had little to offer in return. Struggling to find compensation for their needed beverage, the British discovered the advantages of trading opium for tea. Easily seducing the Chinese with a cheep alternative for compensation, their greed for tea only grew. Becoming comfortable with their trading situation, the British were infuriated when the Chinese attempted to stop the Opium Trade. Finally resulting in battles between the British and Chinese, (know as the Opium Wars), the British were guaranteed their tea, and granted what they wanted, at the cost of violence. King Leopold II, the monarch of Belgium. Having a lack of colonies, King Leopold’s only hope for new territory would be in Africa. He began to show interest in Africa by becoming an advocate for illegal slave trade and other issues thus becoming popular among the African eople. Building roads, hospitals, and other infrastructure the African population began to acquire a strong trust for him. Starting his turn on Africa, King Leopold began to use African mercenaries in 1879 to control the Kongo. His reasons for this were to control much land in Africa and declare the seized land â€Å"his† property. Gaining wealth from the trading the abundant ivory, his greed for land and tusks only grew. Natives were eventually brutalized, ears and limbs were severed off of those that opposed him. After leaving piles of dead elephants for the natives to discard, his soldiers sailed down the congo river shooting the Lunda, or Mongo for sport. King Leopold’s greed for wealth from ivory trade brought horrible violence to the people of Africa, and caused a decrease in the elephant population. Both the trade of tea, and ivory caused greed for those who desired it, and when the threat of a stop to the trade presented itself, violence was the only answer, today we can see the same pattern carrying out as it did hundreds of years ago, as greed for oil grows. How to cite Review for the World That Trade Created, Papers

The Mob Monologue Essay Example For Students

The Mob Monologue Essay A monologue from the play by John Galsworthy NOTE: This monologue is reprinted from The Mob. John Galsworthy. New York: Charles Scribner\s Sons, 1914. HELEN: I\ve seena vision! I\d just fallen asleep, and I saw a plain that seemed to run into the skylikethat fog. And on it there weredark things. One grew into a body without a head, and a gun by its side. And one was a man sitting huddled up, nursing a wounded leg. He had the face of Hubert\s servant, Wreford. And then I sawHubert. His face was all dark and thin; and he hada wound, an awful wound here. The blood was running from it, and he kept trying to stop itoh! Kitby kissing it. Then I heard Wreford laugh, and say vultures didn\t touch live bodies. And there came a voice, from somewhere, calling out: Oh, God! I\m dying! And Wreford began to swear at it, and I heard Hubert say: Don\t, Wreford; let the poor fellow be! But the voice went on and on, moaning and crying out: I\ll lie here all night dyingand then I\ll die! And Wreford dragged himself along the ground; his face all devilish, like a man who\s going to kill. Still that voice went on, and I saw Wreford take up the dead ma n\s gun. Then Hubert got upon his feet, and went tottering along, so feebly, so dreadfullybut before he could reach and stop him, Wreford fired at the man who was crying. And Hubert called out: You brute! and fell right down. And when Wreford saw him lying there, he began to moan and sob, but Hubert never stirred. Then it all got black againand I could see a dark woman-thing creeping, first to the man without a head; then to Wreford; then to Hubert, and it touched him, and sprang away, and it cried out. He\s dead.